Wordslinger

As I sat on panels this weekend, I began to think about redefining myself. I had been introducing myself as a "scholar" but discovered that this can cause (subconsciously) some to become defensive and mildly hostile towards remarks that really aren't negative. It happens in cyberspace, too, and eventually I get tired and discouraged by these occasional reactions from others, particularly if they hit me at the wrong time.

Of course, to be honest, I *have* been known to whack people over the head with scholarly credentials when they say something I think is wrong and hold onto the position like a bulldog on a bone. That may be seen as bullying on my part.

So I did some thinking about it and after long rumination, I decided that it would be best to simply identify myself as a "humorist." I think it sounds friendly, and there are a number of humorists who have an interesting range of talents, so it might not be too outre' to talk about a play or the latest silly filk or whatever (speaking of which, I had several requests to post the lyrics for "Wardrobe accident" and I will do that tomorrow.)

Of course, then everyone will expect me to be funny.

I'm not sure where the rat traps and unintended consequences in THAT label are, but I guess I'll go find out. I don't want to seem arrogant, but saying you're a scholar seems to set you up for being perceived as arrogant. I think maybe it'll be just good enough to be a humorist.